In anticipation of the deposits to the front of the court on the appeal, the Internet Archive announced that it has removed over 500,000 books out of the library and its digital. The decision is a result of the victory obtained in the first instance, out of four of the author, who has filed the complaint.
"The support the Internet Archive
Hachette Book Group, HarperCollins Publishers, John Wiley & Sons Inc. and in the Penguin Random House paditën Archive of the Website in the year 2020 for the violation of the copyright law. According to the four publishers of the usa, non-profit organizations to operate in a library for pirated, as it allows the user to aksesojnë copies of the digital book. In fact, the Internet Archive operates as a library, to be normal, in that it has purchased or received the law books in the format of paper.
However, the court of first instance ruled in favor of the four editors. It then took an order from a judge, according to which, the Internet Archive should have to take the over 500,000 books, including those of the editors and publishers enrolled in the national Association, the Publishers of the usa. This means that users are not able to take on the lease.
Publishers seek royalties for the digital versions of the book. The Internet Archive is claiming that the rental of the control of digital is considered a “use by right” according to the law on the rights of the author. This is the verse that is probably going to be based on the process of appeal to the planning, to the 28th of June. Further, the publisher does not offer any evidence that the market for books, electronics damaged by the library (in the real gain is increased).
The Internet Archive has launched a petition asking the assistance of the users, hoping in vain that the publishers are going to change your mind. The paper highlights the effects of the removal of the books to the students, teachers, and researchers, and for people with low incomes, and for the preservation of the culture (a lot of the books don't exist in the version of the paper).
Discussion about this post