Regardless if you are consenting to the use and, or, not, it is impossible to deny that the intelligence artificial you're making great progress in medicine. In charge of millions of research and data, a chatbot possesses a knowledge which no man can shpresojë to memorize for the rest of his life. The aspect of the more obvious it is diagnosis of the disease. IT will not only be able to identify the patologjitë to let the doctor be in doubt, but it can be done even from a distance, without tests-invasive.
Tv doctors recognize the benefits of artificial intelligence. For this reason, when Dr. Adam Rodman, began a study to evaluate these advantages, he was pretty sure of the outcome, which would be: his colleagues to assist with the ChatGPT will make the test better than they think for themselves. But there's more...
ChatGPT diagnostikon better than the doctor
The survey was attended by 50 doctors from hospitals in the united states. They were presented in 6 cases, of which one must be formulonin the diagnosis, explaining the rationale of their own. The cases are real, and they are a part of the 105 most commonly used in the various studies since the early 1990s.
Of course, they would not have been published ever before, which means that neither the participants nor the ChatGPT don't know about it. There is only one of the 6 files that were leaked ahead of time, with the examples of the answers correct, and incorrect, to be clear on what was expected.
50. the doctors were divided randomly into 2 groups. The first group used the ChatGPT in order to identify the disease, while the second one had to be to work in an independent manner. It was matën also, the abilities of the chatbot with it. The results were surprising.
The set of control and, without the help of IT, he came to a result, an average of 74%. Practitioners who use the chatbot in the out a little bit more, it is better to 76%. ChatGPT i broke out all over, making an average of about 90%. How do you explain this result?
Why ChatGPT is better than a doctor?
After the shock of the initial, Dr. Rodman was unable to comprehend what had just happened. It provides two main points. First of all, the doctor did not believe IT when they suggest something that is opposed to them. On the contrary, having seen ChatGPT, which makes the hypothesis of the different strengths of their own. Often, by mistake.
This observation makes sense to Laura Zwaan, which deals with reasoning and clinical and error diagnostic: “And people, in general, have a lot of self-confidence when they think they have the right.” The other, which explains the results of the study, it is much more specific: a lot of doctors don't know how to use it ChatGPT to their full potential.
Dr. Jonathan H. Chen, one of the authors, noting that the vast majority are using IT as a search engine, while asking questions such as is it cirroza is a risk factor for cancer?. In the end,the “it is only a part of the doctors realized that they could be copied and ngjisnin word for word, all of the file into the chatbot, and just ask him to give a response to a full-on, all the question.”
So, the set up is twofold. In addition to the training of the practitioners on the use of artificial intelligence in their work, they will also need to know that IT can sometimes give you an answer to that, he turns back to them, regardless of their own experience many years.
Discussion about this post