AirTag-and the Apple is created for track the personal belongings, have turned into an instrument of terror, the victims of the harassment. Dozens of people have been accused of by the company in Cupertino, that caused the harm through the use of a indecent the gjurmuesit to its name, providing a lawsuit against Apple in October. Despite the claims, the initial of the Apple to reject the appeals, the three defendants are rushing to claim their own, in California.
AirTags as an ally to the stalker s
Stalkers have misrepresented the purpose of the initial AirTag, using it to track their victims without their knowledge. Having hidden in the device itself or in the motor vehicles and their abusers are able to monitor each and every move of their victims. Most of the time, they were all with her, or ex-partners, but it is the situation even more troubling, in which the followers are foreigners, with the themes of the dark.
The plaintiffs claim that Apple knew about the risks posed by the AirTag, but did not receive an appropriate and effective corrective action to protect the victims of harassment. According to California law, a company can be prosecuted for neglect. However, Apple defended by saying that it has designed the AirTag measures for the security of the “pashembullta,” and that they should not be held responsible for misuse of a product of its own.
Apple is under attack: negligence, or other measures, inadequate security?
The judge never ruled out completely, the position of the Apple, arguing that the law of California could not require the company to do more to limit the abuse of the AirTag of followers. However, he allowed the first three plaintiffs to proceed with the case, and the fact that the final decision could not be taken at this early stage.
Regardless of the outcome of the matter, in a world ever more connected, it is essential that companies in the technology, including Apple, to assume the responsibility for the protection of the user, especially in the case of devices that can be used easily to the purposes of the unauthorized. indeed, the noble.. .
Discussion about this post