Google has a monopoly in the areas of research and for advertising on the internet. That's what she said Amit Mehta, a federal judge out of the country, a record of 286 pages (PDF) published by the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia, in connection with a lawsuit antitrust, which includes the Department of Justice against a group of Mountain View.
As reviewed in detail, and the peshoi carefully to the testimony and the evidence, the court came to the following conclusion: Google is a monopolist and has acted as such, to preserve the monopoly of it.
Google and monopoly: the sentence
According to practice, the answer to the bigG is not delayed (please refer to the item is intended for you to read in its entirety). It comes in the form of a statement that is attributed to Kent Walker, the head of Affairs, and Global. Here it is in the form of language used.
The decision to accept that Google offers the boy to me to be a good search, but it arrives at a conclusion that there should not be permitted to make it easily available and accessible. As this process continues, we will be focusing on the production of the products that people consider to be useful and easy to use.
One of the companies that testified against Google, as well as a representative of DuckDuckGo, a search engine as an alternative, which has been active in front of the browser for some time. The company welcomed the decision of the judge, noting that the legal battles it has not been completed. These are the words of the Kamyl Bazbaz, the Vice-President of the Senior Communications and Public Affairs.
The journey ahead will be long. As we see in the European Union, and the territories of the other, Google is going to do everything that was in his power to avoid a change in the behavior of her own. However, we do know that there is a requirement to be close to the options on the search and the decision to support access to more options.
It should be noted that the court did not recognize the validity of all allegations made by the us Department of Justice, but he confirmed the situation to the monopoly in the context of the services and of the pursuit of the general, and advertising in the text to show to the general.
Legal battles will be in
It's not clear what that would mean a decision in the present for the future of Google+, as it refers solely to the responsibility for the conduct carried out by the company, not the possible solutions will be decided.
Of course, it affects the item has, including that which relates to the contracts signed with companies such as Apple, to promote the use of the engine, and his research on the equipment sold within the shfletuesve to be distributed. In the case of a group of Kupertinos, we describe a strategy is detrimental to the competition.
The prospect of losing tens of billions of revenue to be provided by Google, which is currently the lead with little or no cost to the Apple keeps the Apple of lançojë the engine in its search for when it will have the capacity to do so.
The competitor Bing is terrific
Again, with respect to the election of apple's bitten, quoted a passage from the record of the Eddy Cue, Vice President of Senior Services, which brings into question, Microsoft-in the service of his own.
There's no more you and Microsoft can offer to the pre-loaded Live.
The engines of search, Google has increased the share of its market share, from 80 per cent to 90 per cent in the period between 2009 and 2020, while Bing is currently hanging in a little more than 6%, while it was not, in fact, a competitor.
A question very similar to the front of the ad, where a finger is run mainly by the arrangements of the franchise to the state.
Discussion about this post