After taking a pause for a temporary, Google asked the Court of Appeal of California anulonte the decision of the first instance court, and the order of the judge for the imposition of changes to a comprehensive on the Play Store. The company's Mountain View rank for a number of reasons to justify the claim of her own.
The process of appeal from the February 3, 2025
The trial, which resulted in the loss of Google was based on a complaint filed by Epic Games about four years ago. The jury ruled that the company kaliforniane has a monopoly on the distribution of applications to the Android, and systems of remuneration. At the end of the second part of the procedure, antitrust, judge James Donato issued an order of permanent residence, which requires changes to many in the Play Store.
Google's got a stay of the temporary (the changes are going to get from the 1st of November until the end of the appeal. With a new document from a 110-page (PDF) and he brought him all of the reasons as to why the decision of the first instance court, and the order needs to be cancelled (it is also available with an extract of the main points).
According to the company's Mountain View, the remedies proposed by the Epic Games (and approved by the court) will have a negative impact on consumers, developers, and OEM. The issues of safety and security will be increased, and you may be in violation of the rights of the copyright for it applications will be distributed through the shops of the unknown.
If the order is held at power in an appeal to Google, it will have less of a chance to compete against Apple. The treatment of them also noted that the company Mountain View. At the end of the process is similar. (i started following a complaint to the Epic Games), and Apple is not committed to a monopolist.
Google to rank a series of errors of law that affect both the decision as well as the order. Proceedings before the court of appeals are scheduled for the 3rd of February, 2025. A spokesperson for the Epic Games said that the appeal of Google + is manifestly ill-founded, and based on the arguments of the wrong answers, so it's just a desperate attempt to avoid compliance with the decision of the jury, and the order of the judge.
Discussion about this post