Between the Apple and the Metës it seems that there's bad blood. The apple doesn't bite as soon as it has criticised the harsh demands of a number of Metës to have access to the means of its own software, claiming that they pose a risk to privacy and security of their users.
But, although the Drawback is that i tend to get in the hand of the secrets of the Apple? It is entirely the fault of the Markets in the Digital... DMA of the European Union, requires Apple to allow interaction with the rivals, and the developers of the application. And if you don't do it, heavy penalties of up to 10% of the turnover of the global. So, Apple should open up the doors of the garden to her, regardless of whether or not she likes it or not.
Apple is contrary to the demands of the interaction of the Spot's put at risk the privacy and the security of their users
According to Apple, the Meta is made of 15, the demand for interactive, more so than any other company. And these are not just any demand: a Meta wishes to have access to the depth in the technologies of the Apple, being vulnerable, potentially, the safety and security of the user.
Apple points out that many of these claims have nothing to do with devices and hardware, to the Meta-s, as well as the glasses smart Ray-Ban or a headset, virtual reality, and mixed. In other words, what you need, there are Drawbacks to cut out the secrets of the Apple, if not for the interests of his own?
But what would happen if Apple's going to take to the requirements of the Metës? According to the company's Cupertino, Bugs may be in the hands of a hill, with the sensitive data of users, as well as the messages, the emails, the use of the applications, images, and even passwords.
Meta asserted: “Apple uses a privacy, as well as an excuse to avoid the competition”
Of course, the Bugs don't want to be charged with the crime, and afterwards cracking down on the hook. A spokesperson for the company, Zuckerberg said: “this Apple is saying the truth is that it does not believe in the interaction. Whenever the Apple is called upon to bring its antikonkurruese, it shall be protected for reasons of privacy, which have no basis in reality.”
In other words, according to the Metës, Apple is using privacy as a cover to fit, to avoid opening up to the competition, and to maintain the dominance of its history.
For the European union to oversee Apple's
In the middle of this war between the titanëve, the European Commission, acting as the referee. The body that oversees the competition, the EU has proposed a series of measures to compel Apple to allow access to, the requirements of the developers to provide updates on the choice of interaction and to establish a mechanism for the resolution of disputes.
Apple is also required to provide interaction for the features like the notifications on the apple between the equipment thereof, including the Apple Watch, and Vision Pro. The commission shall take a final decision on the compatibility of Apple as of march 2025.
Discussion about this post