The U.s. department of Justice had issued an ultimatum Google+: sell Chrome os and Android, or cancel the operation on their own. The goal? The opposition to the monopoly of the gjigantit Mountain View in the market is to search on the internet. But the Big G, it is not agreed upon, and the kundërsulmon with a proposed alternative.
Google refused the request of the DOJ: Chrome os and Android are not for sale
Google does not intend to give up the jewels of its Chrome os and Android. To address concerns about its position of the dominant, it is proposed as an alternative solution. First of all, he wants to give to the producers of the shfletuesve such as the Apple, and Mozilla is much more freedom in the choice of the engine, search time, with the ability to change any twelve (12) months, and differentiating him from between the platforms of the various ways in which the browsing history.
The Big G thought that as it was a manufacturer of smartfonëve, one of the other line is hot in the battle of antitrust. The proposal in this case is that allowed them to utilize it freely search engines on the devices of their own, not forced, they just have to Google.
Furthermore, he would like to let the manufacturers to be free to choose which apps to the Google, it will include the following, with no set packages, or the limitations of the packaged prior as well as if you want Chrome os, you must install the " Google Search”. All of it can be put in an independent manner, on the basis of the terms and conditions more favorable.
Me, too much bloatware, the less benefit to the user?
The idea of Google is to provide the producers of the smartfonëve me a lot of flexibility of which applications need to utilize ahead of time, may also have implications for the negative to the end users. On the one hand, the manufacturer will have much more freedom to maneuver, it is true, and there will be portions of the agreement is binding to the Big G, But on the other hand, this flexibility would run the risk of resulting in an influx of people pointless, invading, and is very difficult to uninstall the application.
A compromise is hard
Google wants to emphasize that these proposals have not been made lightly. In fact, they are going to have a significant impact on the pattern of its business and the relationship with the partner. However, the company believes that such a solution could be to address the concerns of the court, without compromising the privacy and the security of its users, as you did to the requirements of the DD's.
The game between Google and the U.s. Department of Justice, it is still open. Mountain View and will appeal its decision to put a monopoly on on-going research on the internet, but they must submit alternative proposals to remedy the situation, in the meantime. The ball is now in the realm of the DOJ, which will need to assess whether the choice of the Google, they are sufficient, or whether it will insist on the application much more.
Discussion about this post