Google has not sent a letter to the European Commission, saying that it is not going to be used on the verification of the facts and the outcome of the search and the video on YouTube. This is the kind of moderating provided for in the Code of Conduct for the Dezinformimin introduced in the year 2022, which would be included in the Determination of the Services and the Digital (the SEA).
No verification of facts for the Search, and YouTube
The code of conduct was introduced for the first time in 2018. The latest version of its up-to-date to the year 2022 has been adopted by 40 companies, including Google. The signatories undertake to implement measures to counter the spread of the news to be false. At the end of may, 2023, following the acquisition of Elon Musk, Twitter decided not to follow the code.
Participation is voluntary, and companies can't drop out of the code at any time. Making a commitment is the use of the organizations of foreign affairs of the verification of the evidence to moderate the content. The European commission, you can convert commitments to non-binding on the enforcement measures on the basis of the Law of Services of the Digital.
Kent Walker, the president of the global business of Google, said that the company is not going to use the background to the evidence for a Search, and YouTube, because it's not appropriate, or effective for services. As it was shown in the election of a variety of year 2024, the current system of moderation of the content, it works perfectly. By the beginning of August, 2024, the user will be able to add notes to the video on YouTube (currently only in the US) in order to show any inaccuracies.
Google is going to undo all the efforts of the audit of the evidence before it, the code of conduct is made binding. The company's Mountain View there is no doubt that it will have to be reconciled with the Evidence of the Utility of Digital Europe. The Meta recently, however, eliminate the program and its control of the facts (just the USA) in order to follow the example of a X.
Discussion about this post